| |
Judy wrote:
Let me put it this way. i do not believe others *should* feel any
particular way. However, i am put off by proclamations that
humiliation, just for example, *is absolutely dangerous* or is
*absolutely harmful* to some people.
You can be put off by it all you like, Judy. You don't know what my
life has been, what it is like, or what will harm me. Until you do,
you cannot know whether or not something will harm me. By talking
with Argentium, we have *BOTH* decided that therisk of harm that will
be done to me in regards to playing with humiliation makes it not
worth playing with.
Until you talk to me for three weeks straight, for hours at a time,
and turn me inside out, please at least grant the possibility that he
just *MIGHT* have a point with that. Ok?
Judy wrote: To use one example, Moonlight
said if Argentium had called her a bitch that would absolutely harm
her.
No, I did not. I said that I would react differently if he said it to
me than I would react if I or one of my friends said it, or if JK said
it.
I know what Argentium means when he calls someone a bitch. I am *not*
what he considers a bitch. I am not overly aggressive, pushy, and
someone that will trample over other people to get where I want to be.
In other words, the traditional meaning of bitch, used to describe
women in the corporate atmosphere.
What I and my friends mean by bitch is a compliment given to someone
that stands up for themselves while not harming someone.
JK calling me a bitch would garner one of two reactions. Either I
would thank him for being accurate if I've tried to snarl and shred
him to ribbons, or I would laugh because it would mean I had struck a
nerve.
In these situations, Argentium's reaction *WOULD* be harmful to our
relationship because it would damage it. Get it? I never said that
calling me a bitch would absolutely harm me. I said it would cause
harm because it would mean there was something *SERIOUSLY* wrong in
our relationship, knowing how *HE* uses the word.
Don't put words in my mouth.
Judy wrote: If you take this out in the open and really look at it you cansee
it is absurd.
Yes, it is, and that's why I never *said* what you are implying.
Judy wrote: Maybe, because of past experiences, "bitch" has come to
be a very negative word for her.
Actually, I am quite proud to be an alpha wolf bitch. I am *not*
proud when someone calls me a bitch in the manner that Argentium
understands the word. It would mean that I had harmed someone
unintentionally.
Judy wrote: All the more reason to take a look at
it and deprive it of its power.
The word bitch does not have any intrinsic power over me, nor do I
consider it humiliating. Therefore, there is nothing to do with the
word.
Judy wrote: This is what JK was saying.
I am well aware of what JK was saying. I simply disagree with him.
So does Argentium. Obviously, you don't. We *CAN* all have our own
opinions, and they don't even have to agree.
Judy wrote: i can
imagine, for example, Argentium lovingly telling her she is his bitch.
I can't. Because that is not the way that Argentium uses or
understands the word. *IF* he changed his mind about the word, or his
understanding of the word, then it wouldn't bother me in the slightest
to be called a bitch by him.
Do you understand what I'm saying here? Or do I need to try to
explain it differently? (No, that's not snide, I'm honestly trying to
explain...)
Our understanding of words color how we use them and what we mean by
them. I am aware that Argentium uses that particular word differently
than I do. Therefore, I have to consider *how* he uses it and *what*
he means, if he calls me a bitch. It generally would *not* be nice.
Judy wrote: She may at first feel a little shaken by this, but i doubt she will be
irreparably harmed by it, and she may in fact find that it does not
hurt in this context at all.
In that context, I have been called a bitch in the past and taken
pride in it. The *WORD* does not hold the power. The meaning behind
the word holds the power. With his current understanding and usage of
the word, *YES* I would be harmed by it. Or our relationship would
be. Got it?
Judy wrote: But again, i will say that no, humiliation is not for everyone at
every time. When i first got into this it was the biggest no-no on my
list, because of my fragile self-esteem and my heavily-humiliated
childhood. i was certain that i would be harmed by it. i have now
moved to a stage where i welcome it. i would never suggest, though,
that anyone try to move there if they are not comfortable with it. But
only keep their minds open, only do not assume you will always feel
this way.
I have never said that I will always feel this way. Humiliation, in
general, is not something that I can't be around or can't deal with.
I'm well aware that there are a *lot* of people, yourself included,
that love to use it in what they do. I've explained, in great detail
:), why I, and Argentium, do not.
I don't know the future. I've never said I do. I do know his past,
and my past, and I don't forsee using it in the future. If that
changed, then it does.
Judy wrote: So even though i give that example above with A. calling M.
"bitch" i do not suggest or imply that he should be doing this at this
time. Only that he and she keep an open mind about this.
Pick a different word. :) I think I've explained why him calling me a
bitch, at this point, would be a Bad Thing.
Judy wrote: i realize that i tend to get a little testy, too, and sometimes
downright angry, when all i really am hoping for is a little more
listening to words and a little less attacking of people.
Well, I've tried to keep the tone down to discussing or debating in
the other thread, for that very reason. Argentium and I are both
getting mail from people indicating that they are getting something
out of the thread, so we'll keep going until it reaches some sort of
conclusion.
|