To Masters: Something to do with your female slaves III   (11/16/98)
	[snip of Lynn talking about how to safely (of sorts :) do a parking garage exhibition...] JS wrote: No! There are no such rules for a Master. If indeed the Master checked out the garage to make sure no one was around then it would be no different from undressing a sub in his own bedroom. Except for the lack of bed, closet, and other sundry bedroom items, and the inclusion of possibly dozens of cars. JS wrote: That's kind of stupid and defeats the purpose of the whole exercise. Gee, and here I thought the whole purpose of any D/s exercise was for the dom and sub to get aroused and boff their brains out. Trips to the police station tend to put a damper on that. Unless of course, *THAT* is your true kink... JS wrote: The purpose is to show that a Master may indeed expose a sub to legal danger by asking her to undress wherever he pleases, whenever he pleases. Why would a Master want to expose his slave to danger in this manner? Why would a Master not value the thing that he has agreed to take into his life? Why would a Master not want to keep his property safe? Hmmmm? Oh....'scuse me. I forgot. TRUE Masters don't really care about their property. Slaves are, after all, a dime a dozen. JS wrote: A considerate Master will aid her if she indeed gets into any trouble. A considerate Master will not get her into trouble in the first place. JS wrote: JKay appears to possess many dominant traits. He tries to go beyond play to true ownership. Unfortunately for him he is born in the wrong age. He should have been by Achilles' side, *owning* the women of the cities they sacked. Regardless of whether JK does true ownership or not, whatever that means, you are a moron. A "true" Master/slave relationship is one that both partners are safe in.