| |
JK wrote:
I have my opinions about you and your guy - just as you do of me. I don't
find
you to be all that stable to be honest
SoccerMom wrote: Moonlight, while I suspect that you're not exactly rushing off to the shrink on
the basis of this character's evaluation, I just wanted to put in my $.02. The
guy's nuts.
Well, you know, I picked up the phone this morning to the counselling
center that they have through work. Then I just shook myself and the
mood passed. Though I did have the distinct urge to chew my cud for
about an hour afterwards.
JK wrote: - just not my type nor one that I can
recommend as a good example of a slave identified female through whom to
admire.
SoccerMom wrote: What would one admire through a slave identified female? One might admire her
(though who would admire meat? I love it when he talks out of both sides of
his mouth at once), but admiring something *through* her? I have this vision
of doms with X-ray vision, staring through subs at Picassos.
They're checking out your digestive tract to see if you have four
stomachs to make a proper cow, Lynn. I stole a peek in their True
Master Handbook.
JK wrote: Now maybe some like your type of relationship and attitude - fine -
you have your group of friends and I mine. I think you have way too much top
energy for a slave.
SoccerMom wrote: The stronger the slave, the stronger the master must be. So I can see why
you'd say that, JK.
Telling, isn't it? He seems to be rather threatened by the fact that
I have too much Top energy or whatever to be a proper slave.
Anyone have the handbook for Proper Slaves lying around so I can peek
at it and get this damn slave thing down right?
JK wrote: And your postings lack consistency in what you think you
are from what you feel and say you are doing or willing to be put through by
Arg. I simply don't see you, at least in print, to be honest in your
relationship to Arg and to who you think you are in that relationship.
SoccerMom wrote: Gee, I see exactly the opposite. Moonlight has expressed her limits quite
clearly,
Thank you. I was beginning to pull my hair out in frustration and
thinking that I *wasn't* being clear. Glad to know I don't have to
pull out the hair, that it's just him being dense, and I won't get
punished for having ripped out said hair, since Master enjoys it. :)
SoccerMom wrote: as well as the fact that Tiger has agreed with them--and in fact that
they lie near his own limits.
For the most part, yes. He's actually got much narrower limits in
some ways than I do. And in some ways, mine are much narrower. The
intersection of the two seems to be where we're most comfortable. :)
SoccerMom wrote: In separate postings, each has said very similar
things, leading me to believe that they either a) write them together, but use
two very different "voices" or (more likely) b) simply know, and agree on, how
they like to live their lives.
You forgot that c) We're actually the same person and it's just a
conspiracy. :)
We will occasionally bounce posts off of each other before posting
them, mostly to proofread on long posts (since it's easier to miss
things in those kinds) or to make certain we're not out in left field.
Tiger is more likely to do this than I am, unless it involves the
family members :)
And yes, we both know and agree on how to live our lives. That was
part of the negotiation before he made me his slave. I had to see if
those rules were things that I could follow. And, really, they aren't
all that different than my own in the first place. It really *is*
possible to find someone that is a pretty damn good match, if you're
patient.
I never used to believe that.
SoccerMom wrote: As opposed to the guy who posts long lists of things for other people to do,
and then tells folks that he doesn't necessarily play that way himself.
Which is what *I* find so interesting. He yammers on and on about two
people that are consistent with their ideas and rules and how they
live their lives, and yet posts reams of rules that even *HE* doesn't
live by.
Talk about hypocracy...
|