| |
moonlight wrote:
Yes, that influence is there. When we're watching tv, maybe he will poke
or pinch or twist or bite or whatever....but maybe not. :) We dont'
necessarily run around decrying "Oh, Master, blahblahblahMasterblahblahblah."
It's usually more along the lines of, "Tiger, did you take your allegra
this morning? No? Well *GO* DO *IT!*". And *this* from the slave
half of the pairing.
wickedNwild wrote: Ok...so what is the definition of 24/7? What's the definition of being a
slave then?
24/7 is defined by each couple to mean what they wish it to, in reality.
In general, it means that one person in the pairing is owned by the other
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Each couple will have their own rules
and boundaries and needs that will need to be addressed for them.
The *real* meaning for me is that I wear his collar every day. All
day. And that he has the *right* to make whatever decisions he wishes
to about what I will do. Because he has the right doesn't mean that
he will always *exercise* the right. Most of the time, the d/s
is "backgrounded"...there, but at a lower level than when playing or
alone.
moonlight wrote: Please don't take this the wrong way, but I think you have a highly idealized
version of slavery that you're assuming that all 24/7 relationships are
based around. Generally, what *you* are ascribing to 24/7 isn't the case.
Sure, there are some...I've not met too many of them. I still make most
of my own decisions. Most. And loss of self-confidence has nothing to do
with making decisions. It has everything to do with your partner being
either encouraging or discouraging of you and what you are. Which, also,
can happen in a vanilla relationship. Generally, it's called abuse, in
and amongst vanillas.
wickedNwild wrote: I don't think I have an "idealized" version of slavery at all!!! I don't
have one at all!! ;-)
*grin* Well, then it is a good place to start. Keep in mind that everyone
will have a slightly different idea about what 24/7 is. Because each pair
has different needs. And the slaves needs *do* need to be met.
wickedNwild wrote: In what you describe..your life is no different than that of any regular
couple.....so why refer to it as "slavery" then?
Because I am owned. It really *is* as simple as that. I have turned my life
over to another person. He has allowed me to have parts of it back. He can
take those away whenever he chooses. Some couples *do* have more rules than
I do. Tiger doesn't particularly go for the "traditional" slave role. I'm
in the process of writing a longish post that talks about who and what I am.
It should be out in the next day or so. Look for it...it might tell you a
little more about slaver and the 24/7...at least *one* couple's take on it.
wickedNwild wrote: I thought (apparently
wrongly) that being a slave was going a few steps beyond being
submissive..in giving up all control on one's personal life!
It is. Sort of. :) Some people are owned as pets, some as submissives,
some as slaves. We all have different names for close to the same thing.
A submissive can say no to her dom. A slave, in the end, must abide by
her Master's decisions. She can try to change his mind....but she must
abide by them. (I use she, here, because I is one..:)
wickedNwild wrote: Again...not
being judgmental or trying to be argumentative...just ....humm...unclear on
the definition I guess!
That's ok. People have been trying to define these things for years. And,
really, I doubt that one concrete definition will ever be worked out. Nor,
to my mind, should it. Slavery is very personal. So is submission. So
is dominance.
|