| |
moonlight wrote:
First, edgeplay is different for everyone. What I posted
about today...that was closer to the edge than I think I've
ever been. It played with my fear of failure..my fear of
abandonment...the rage that's kept locked deep inside where
I don't want to go...
Tobie wrote: I agree that edge play is different for everyone and understand
that MANY forms of edge play are the ones that touch the soul
more than the body.
*heh* Maybe that's the definition of edge play. I can't thin
of a single *action* that everyone would define as edge play.
I do, however, think that the emotions evoked by edge play are
similar in most cases. Edge play plays with our reality.
moonlight wrote: Choking and heavy blood play, that are heavy edge play to you
are not that big a deal to me...this is what I mean by
edge play being very personal. You have to define your
edges for yourself.
Tobie wrote: Yes, Because *I'd* consider playing with an *unloaded &
secured* gun less edgy than heavy blood play, or choking.
Oh, I would agree with that, wholeheartedly. And, for most
cases, I don't consider gunplay edge play *for* *me*. For many
people out there, it is, though, and so I will label it the
way it was simply because it *is* a known type of edge play for
many people.
[snip]
Tobie wrote: While I understand this as an aspect of personality that I
lack, I can see how it effects the decisions that others might
make that *I* would not. Death *may* be a gateway, I really
don't know. I do know that for *me* life is for now, with
*these* people, and to be lived fully.
*nod* I was explaining why it isn't a factor for me. I
realize that other people will respond to the idea of Death
in *much* different ways than I do. In many ways, I've faced
it (in other types of situations) and it doesn't hold fear
for me anymore. Mystery, questions, desire to know what it
*is*...sure. But I don't want those answers *now*. :) I'm
having too much fun living and have too many things to do before
I die.
moonlight wrote: I think that most people are that way, for what it's worth.
Tiger and I both realize that he could break that trust. And
he and I both will have to live with the consequences if that
happens. He's seen it happen before. I've lived through it.
It's a risk that needs to be evaluated like any other safety
concern. I won't deny that it could happen.
Tobie wrote: I think so too.Trust is "supposed" to be long and hard earned,
but it works the other way for me, as soon as I give love, I
give trust. Then as life goes on, usually that trust is slowly
removed. Sad thing.
Oh, I won't give that level of trust without love either. I just
am *very* slow to give love, having been burned by it quite a
bit. friendship, affection, caring...lots of other things...but
not love.
Tobie wrote: Frankly, I really don't see how these things CAN be done
without a long term stable relationship with trust to back up
the actions. I don't see where many of these lines could
possibly be read by someone that wasn't deeply into the other
persons head.
Personally, I'm very skeptical that it can. I leave the possibility
open that it can, I just don't think it likely.
moonlight wrote: Here's another one that will throw you.
What Tiger did to me *showed* me that he cared and valued me.
He cared enough to wind me up, break me, and then put me back
together.
Tobie wrote: This is an aspect of it that I can connect with. I need that
too at times. Need to know he has the capability of doing it. I
couldn't see that in your scene report, but then again, that's
pretty normal too as we would have different triggers and hot
spots for that.
Since Janet also didn't understand the underlying subtle reasons
some things were done, I would suspect that my writing was not as
clear as it could have been. Which is why I'm taking time to answer
as many questions as possible. :) It helps explain some of the
underlying things that didn't get said. I don't mind questions
about things in the least.
There's also the fact that everything is clear to me... :) So
I sometimes miss adding things that seem very obvious to me at
the time that I write it. People asking call attention to where
I was...erm...less than obvious. :)
Tobie wrote: There is no way I could orgasm from a gun, I'd freeze, then get
furious. There is no way I could ever trust that much again if
I felt that I *knew* my partner was going to harm me, however,
though we're touching that *here* you didn't mention having
that kind of fear in your report.
No, I didn't mention it.
Tobie wrote: Was the fear not there? Not something you wanted to discuss?
Not something you want to look at yet?
As far as I can tell, the fear wasn't there. I am aroused by
manifestations of power. It is undeniable that guns hold a
great deal of power. (For better or worse...) I'm just one
of those people that can feel that power and get turned on by
it. I'm not sure if it was the gun itself, the combination of
the gun and Tiger...or the expression of his power over my by
using it...For some reason or combination of those different
kinds of power...fear didn't enter into it.
It's telling that I fear Tiger's displeasure, the idea of being
abandoned, the pit of rage inside me, and the fear of hurting
Tiger more than I fear having a gun shoved up my wabblie bits,
eh?
Tobie wrote: Were you ever in the position to seriously wonder if you might
get shot and die?
( please do not feel obliged to answer those if it's too
sensitive yet. )
I didn't post the report til I was ready to address both positive
and negative questions and comments. :) This happened approximately
a month ago. :)
I don't think the idea that I could be shot or dead entered my
head. A little button clicked off once I realized what he was
saying to me. :) I'd talked a *lot* about it with him before
we ever considered trying it at some future point, and those things
were talked about then.
Keep in mind, though, that I'd *just* faced the worst things in
my mind...getting shot ranks somewhere below all of those things.
My fears hold more power over me than the gun did, or does.
Tobie wrote: Great, thank you, I didn't get that part. Because of how I'm
wired, taking it "right" wouldn't have done much for me, I'd be
doing it because I was placed in a position of not being able
to ::wry smile::
I have that weird thing inside, can't explain it very well and
I know there *must* be a word for it, but I don't know what
that word might be.
Maybe it comes from working with critters for so long. The
ability to shut off all externals and focus tight on one thing
with sheer tenacity of stamina.
"I WILL OUT LAST THIS"
" You may hurt me, you may break me, but I WILL be the one that
takes the final walk."
There have been several times I left a pen bleeding and almost
throwing up from exhaustion, but I made sure the critter was
the first to lay or sit for a break. I made sure they saw me
walking after they stopped doing so.
I have some of that, as well, about most other things in my
life. Push me, and I'll push back. Threaten to kill me, and I
will strike first, where possible.
But in relationships, I'm a wuss. :) Particularly in this
relationship. Fear of failing Tiger...or actually failing him,
is the worst fate that i can imagine. He encourages me to be
who I am...to be the best me I can be. And, for me, that includes
being something that pleases him. When I fail him, it
is devastating. I can take emotional pain and physical pain
until the cows come home to prove a point that I'm committed to
proving. I can't take the pain of failing someone I love. It was
critical that after inducing that pain to watch it for a while,
that he made sure it was gone. Dead. Buried. If only so I didn't
wallow in it when he didn't want me too.
Tobie wrote: And again, a very clear difference between us, for *me* s/m is
an internal thing. He does it to me when timing is right
because I've asked for it, requested it. ( excluding spanking
which he totally enjoys )
He does it because of what *I* get out of it, s/m is a "gift"
from him to me.
I hope that makes sense.
I enjoy sensation play. Which includes pain. I don't enjoy pain
in an SM sense. I don't ask for pain. I submit to it because
he's a sadist. (Though he will claim, from time to time, that I'm
deluding myself about not being a masochist...one of our perennial
struggles. :)
|