| |
moonlight wrote:
Perhaps not permanently, no. ... So
it
goes with kink. Long term inability to meet the
main
needs of one's life outside of WIITWD indicates, to
me,
issues that need to be dealt with and resolved so
that
we are not "escaping from the pain of reality."
Observer wrote: Hrmm, I have problems with this. First of all, I
believe I can multi-task in life, and others can as
well. Ie, I shouldn't stop praying, dating, or
playing just because I'm looking for a job at the same
time. I agree that someone who has a long term
inability to support him or herself perhaps shouldn't
be scening, but surely religion (pagan or otherwise)
could help them pull through no?
I qualified, and you repeated (that's why I left this all
in there), that I was speaking about *long* *term* issues.
Not short term problems. Not "Whoops I got laid off and
must now look for a job" type things but "I can't get off
my lazy ass to bother to find a job and support myself so I'll
go out, get a couple of subs, and convince them to
support me instead" type things.
I personally know of three doms in my area that are
currently in that situation. IMO, they are behaving
in an extremely unethical manner. They are fully
capable of working. However, they find it easier to
have their subs sign over money, get their names put onto
their properties, then hold that power over the subs
rather than do the right thing.
They are a disgrace to themselves and to the community for
taking advantage of people that they have built a up a
dependence in and both we *and* those submissives would
be far better of to run them out of our groups on a rail.
Complete with tar and feathers.
Observer wrote: I think that for something to be accepted, it has to
be in the open.
Why do we need to be accepted? Why do we *CARE* what
the larger society thinks of our kink? I think it's a
losing cause to try to get it accepted. We will be on
the margin at best, and the things that we need to give
up to be there aren't worth the price of admittance, as
far as I'm concerned.
Observer wrote: Now, I admit that it is a lot easier
to hide kink than it is to hide homosexuality, but
people still get outed from time to time. Some loose
their jobs, some can loose their children. This is
unacceptable.
Yes, it is. It's also one of the risks of not playing
by societies rules. And we don't, like it or not.
Those are the risks we run for being who we are.
Observer wrote: It also needs to be in the open for self-acceptance
reason.
Why? What possible help can the society at large be
in helping a person feel comfortable in their own
skin? They don't understand us...they will *never*
understand us. The only people that can help us be
comfortable in our own skin is us....and only the
individual can make that happen. It's work. Everything
in life is.
Government can't make you accept yourself.
Doctors can't make you accept yourself.
The only person who can make you accept yourself is YOU.
Observer wrote: When I was younger I thought I was a
freak/monster. If the scene had been so well hidden
as it was in the past, I would have probably spent a
lifetime of self-loathing. It isn't fun, and it isn't
safe. I would be very surprised if I was the only one
who went through that. Hard statistics are hard to
find, but a portion of teen suicides are actually
auto-erotic asphyxiations. These deaths, brought upon
by lack of education and feelings of
self-destructiveness are avoidable.
Auto-erotic asphyxia is an accident that's not dependent
on mental state. It's an accident. Suicide is something
different. Having been suicidal and playing with asphyxia
(on my own and with others) I can state that the mental
states that bring each about are completely different.
No amount of public acceptance is going to get people over
the self-loathing stage. Or the "I feel alone" stage.
Because even if we *are* accepted, parents aren't going to
just up and tell their kids one day "oh, by the way...
you may want to investigate the ideas of BDSM and see if
they're for you. They're a viable sexual expression."
Kids will have to discover it on their own, the same as
they always have. There's enough information out there
on the net, these days, that it's difficult to believe
that they *won't* find it. And in finding it, they come
to the people that *CAN* help them.
Society certainly won't.
In all the years that gays and lesbians have been fighting
for their rights, they *still* aren't accepted. Tolerated
at best. We, who are often reviled by the GLBT groups,
will, in the end, achieve even less. Because we're more of
a marginal group than *they* are.
So, instead of working to get people who will never
accept us to do just that, I think it's better to focus our
energies and efforts on *OUR* groups. Why should we spend
our energy elsewhere for such little payback?
Observer wrote: Finaly, more oppeness and exposure would facilitate
family acceptance. I am not gay, but if I was, I
could come out to my parents and they would accept it
rather easily due to the fact they've been educated
about it. I realy don't think the same would apply
for bdsm.
Openness doesn't equal acceptance. And even cultural
acceptance doesn't mean individuals will accept you.
People are who they are. Either they will like you or
they won't. Tying your self-image up in hoping for
the acceptance of others who hate you is following the
quick road to killing yourself.
|